Films Aftertaste for Homophobia and Militarism- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theFilms Aftertaste for Homophobia,Militarism and Racism. Answer: Sports and politics do not mix, this is the statement that has been critically explored in the documentary. The documentary is based on Dave Zirins book, A Peoples History of Sports in the United States, Not Just a Game showcases the political scenario that is prevalent on the screens. The documentary focuses on athletes like Billie Jean King, Jackie Robinson, and Pat Tillman athletes who, hardly set as examples in the American sports and politics scenario. Where there is money and power involved politics will surely crop up. Dave Zirin states that, American sports culture shapes cultural attitudes, norms and power arrangements. Sports are a cultural force, a shared social space and a political force, The plot of the documentary discusses several political and societal issues faced by sports personalities in their career (Zirin, 2008). The film covers the careers of famous American sports personalities like Jesse Owens to Howard Cosell, the documentary Not Just a Game exhibits that sports encompasses the concepts of nationalism, militarism, and patriotism which is the exact opposite of politically nonaligned aspect of the perception of sports. With the help of images and footages of old and new interviews of popular athletes, the director points out a series of issues which lead to the conformation of the topic that politics is very well prevalent in American sports community (Briley, 2010). A number of issues are discussed in the movie which was deemed to be glamorous in the sports arena for the longest time, for example: sexism, homophobia, militarism and racism. Not only that the screenplay of the documentary explores the forgotten history of some of the athletes who has a revolutionary career. These people went beyond the field of play to stand up against power anarchy and power misuse and also fought for social issues. The plot of the movie is intensely moving and has a rational flow of knowledge and understanding of the sports culture in the country (Briley, 2010). Sexism and gender discrimination has been an issue in the country for a prolonged period of time until rules and legal framework were set up to support the interest of women in the country, sports is also not an exception, the writer has cited several examples throughout the movie that highlights the issues faced by women athletes and the kind of politics they had to face in the field facing a male opponent. The career of Billie Jean King (famous tennis player) is used as an example to categories and demonstrates the issue further. She had a lasting impression on the game of tennis as she revolutionized the game and was a vocal revolutionary about the woman and gay rights. Title IX of the legal framework of America has encouraged womens participation in sport from a 1 out of 35 share to the currently 1 in 3, the media is also criticized in emphasizing on male sports personalities than female and this has been highlighted in the documentary (Brake, 2012). Media has been recorded to de dicate 1.6 percent of sport air time to women in 2009. In a span of five year the Magazine published by ESPN had only six female covers models. Media coverage of women in sports lack respect and use the female sports personalities as secondary (O'Reilly, 2012). Another social issue that has been highlighted in the documentary is Homophobia. Acceptance of homosexuality has been one of the major issues that the American society and the impact of it have been observed in the sports industry as well. The documentary traces the fact that not a single athlete had accepted their sexuality during the tenure of their career this fact is of course stated during the period this documentary was made. The silence of male athletes of the period on the issue of violence towards women as well as any kind of activities towards homosexuality, this situation was observed throughout the sports community (Sherkat et al., 2014) The scenario has changed for better now and acceptance of homosexuality has also been legalized in several states of America and the sports community has also shown acceptance of homosexuality with time. Jason Collins, for example is the first NBA player who has openly accepted his sexuality in 2014 (Zirin, 2008). Dave Zirin achieved a lot of critical acclamation for the screenplay and the movie discusses the issue of militarism in the sports arena. American football is used as a platform to discuss the examples. There are a number of images from the Fox Sunday NFL anchors in military camouflage as well as the F-14 pre-game flyovers. It also focuses on how a sportsperson uses military expression to illustrate their experience on the field; the examples state that football in America is regarded as the major game. The football culture in the country as described in the documentary is dominated by the traditional male behavioral model some of the examples of this theory are the idea to impose and undergo pain in order to gain success, to succeed at any cost and win in the game regardless of the consequences (Briley, 2010). There are also a lot of militaristic jargons used in the sports like football for example: the term quarterback is actually a rank in among the military generals and is used i n football to indicate a position of a player. The role of a player is this compared with the role of a soldier in the battlefield which indicates the militarism in sports. The documentary shows how these ideas are used to glamorize the sport and bring a sense of masculinity in the sports community. But Zirin shows that militarism is not only prevalent in football but is also prevalent in other sports as well. Indeed, all American sports are either uncritically patriotic or wholly militaristic (Zirin, 2008). The gap that has been identified in this audiovisual representation of the topic of politics in sports is the issue of racism. The documentary discusses a brief of the history of racism in sports with the example of the successful career of Jack Johnson (boxer). Prior to that, men of color and women were treated as secondary and their careers were not followed by the media as well. This was because they were viewed to be physically incapable, lacking mental skills and physical capabilities. The success of Johnson was a benchmark in the American sports history as well as in American society (Zirin, 2008). He ranked as one of the top boxers in the world. In 1910, Johnson even defeated a white male boxer, this becoming a representation of black masculinity and a threat to whites. After the success of Johnson, several other men of color were inspired to join the sports community and take sports as a career option. The documentary states the situation that is revolutionary but does not go further deep in to the issue of how people were treated previously. The film takes a broad perspective of the collective meaning for social justice therefore lacking individual focus on severe issues. The career and success of popular athletes such as Muhammad Ali, Jack Johnson, Jackie Robinson and John Carlos have been discussed but the issue has been highlighted the solution or the revolution in the situation has not been mentioned. Civil rights are used as the overall concern of that the documentary deals with thus reducing the emphasis on individual issues. The documentary portrays the Black Power salute of John Carlos and Tommie Smith on the podium during the Mexico City Olympic Games in the year 1968. Zirin, the narrator of the film, states by mistake about these athletes showing their showing their respect for Civil rights movement when in actuality they expressed their solidarity with Black Power and Human Rights (Briley, 2010). The approach of the narrative of the documentary look forward to place these sports personalities as revolutionaries, who not only strive to make the situation in the sports community better but also fit into the reforming the American society. The documentary uplifts the true spirit of sportsmanship and commemorates the efforts of the athletes who has strived the make the sports community in America a diverse and better opportunity for the young aspirants irrespective of their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation etc (Zirin, 2008). It can be concluded form the above example that the documentary is not like any other sports documentary that focuses on a sports legend and follows the career prospect of a sport, but rather the content is intensely mixed with the political and societal conditions of America which was also impacting the sports community by and large. The personalities who have been discussed in the documentary reformed the community as well as changed the way the sports were depicted even a decade ago. There have been reforms in the community as well as in the society, as these people have strived to put their perspective across and have traced a successful sports career as well. Power, politics and American sports are depicted to be interred connected and the influence of sports in the society has been analyzed to be significant. Reference list: Brake, D. L. (2012). Getting in the game: Title IX and the women's sports revolution. NYU Press. Briley, R. (2010). A People's History of Sports in the United States: 250 Years of Politics, Protest, People, and Play. Journal of Sport History, 37(1), 192-193. O'Reilly, J. (Ed.). (2012). Women and sports in the United States: A documentary reader. UPNE. Sherkat, D. E., Powell-Williams, M., Maddox, G., De Vries, K. M. (2011). Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 19882008. Social Science Research, 40(1), 167-180. Tomlinson, A., Young, C. (Eds.). (2006). National identity and global sports events: Culture, politics, and spectacle in the Olympics and the football World Cup. SUNY Press. Zirin, D. (2008). A people's history of sports in the United States: 250 years of politics, protest, people, and play. The New Press.